• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Idle processing
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Idle processing


  • Subject: Re: Idle processing
  • From: Robert Grant <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:13:36 -0500

On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 09:44 AM, Glenn Olander wrote:

On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 05:49 AM, Marc Poirier wrote:

the OS knows better than the host about how busy
the system is.

Very well put :-).

Relying on the OS to fill out the set of services required by a plugin (at least compared to VST) seems to imply that AU is not intended to become cross platform?
I think that's a given - this is one the OS X exclusive features.

I haven't seen much discussion here about the number of audio units. The SDK has been out for 6 months now, but you can count the number of audio units on your hands and feet. Is anyone surprised that so few (or so many) have appeared? I believe VST, in it's initial version (also mac only, and was limited to FX) had somewhat more activity.
Well it was the first so there was probably a lot of excitement and experimentation. Plug-in technology is now much more mature and has less of a "hey, cool, let's have a crack at that!" factor. What's different about AU is that the number of hosts available is far greater than at the beginning of VST. I think once audio apps of all sorts become AU hosts things'll pick up. VST hosting was/is a black art.

Unlike VST's original release however, there are a large number of existing plugins today which merely need to be ported. Why haven't more AU's appeared? Is it because one must rely on the OS for services like idle processing, and thus more closely tied to the OS? Is it the relative complexities of the SDKs? Or is it simply a matter of limited market demand? Marc and Urs and others are making efforts to promote AU, but is there something more we, the AU community, should be doing?
I think most developers are getting their VST plugins ported to X to support SX and then will work to make them AUs. Until there's a pro hosting environment needing plugins there's no real need to release them. And as kinks are still being worked out there's little incentive to be on the "bleeding" edge.

Logic 6 will help a lot I think and any other apps Apple chooses to release with AU hosting ability.

IMHO,

Robert.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Promoting AU, was Idle processing
      • From: "Stewart Moroney" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Idle processing (From: Glenn Olander <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Idle processing
  • Next by Date: Re: Idle processing
  • Previous by thread: Re: Idle processing
  • Next by thread: Promoting AU, was Idle processing
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread