• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: AU Hosts and Parts, Groups and Multi-timbrality
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AU Hosts and Parts, Groups and Multi-timbrality


  • Subject: Re: AU Hosts and Parts, Groups and Multi-timbrality
  • From: Chris Reed <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 13:26:57 -0500

Bill, here's another example for you for reasons that MusicEffects should support note events.

James, yes, I think a harmoniser is perfectly possible with the AU spec as is, as a MusicEffect. AUs can have any number of output busses, so each harmonised voice could be sent to its own bus in addition to a mix out. And a MusicEffect can react to data on different MIDI channels just fine without needing to be multi-timbral.

Although I suspect there are those who would argue that a harmoniser is really more like a synth. And in that case, it could indeed be implemented as multi-timbral device. Depends on your point of view, I guess...

-chris

On Sunday, Jul 27, 2003, at 18:03 US/Central, James Chandler Jr wrote:

These multi-timbral threads have been very interesting, thanks.

A question for curiosity only, since I'll not be writing such a plugin--

Are the conceptual hooks all there, to make a pitch corrector or vocal harmony Music Effect, which receives an audio stream + MIDI notes, and outputs a corrected or harmonized audio stream? Would hosts have a lot of trouble supporting such an AU?

A possible user preference for a harmonizer (which would be nice but not essential), might be to input a single channel audio stream, but output separate audio streams for each harmonized voice? That would allow subsequent discrete processing on each harmonized voice.

I suppose a harmonizer would work "close enough for rock-n-roll" as a mono-timbral synth. But perhaps there could be situations where it would be nice to control each generated harmony from its own MIDI channel, to allow non-parallel harmonization... ferinstance where the "emulated soprano" might want to cross lines against the "emulated tenor"?

James Chandler Jr.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.

References: 
 >Re: AU Hosts and Parts, Groups and Multi-timbrality (From: James Chandler Jr <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Alternative to Delay()
  • Next by Date: Re: seeking advice w/ coreaudio
  • Previous by thread: Re: AU Hosts and Parts, Groups and Multi-timbrality
  • Next by thread: Re: Parts, Groups and Multi-timbrality
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread