Re: AUGraphs and Logic
Re: AUGraphs and Logic
- Subject: Re: AUGraphs and Logic
- From: Marc Poirier <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 13:10:11 -0600 (CST)
Hmmmm, I'm not sure if this is an issue of being "solid" as much as it is
an issue of what it is. I haven't worked directly with the AUGraph API
yet, so I might have this wrong, but my understanding is that it is not
meant to be the end-all be-all of AU hosting APIs, but instead to strike a
balance between features and simplicity, a balance which allows it to meet
the needs of most AU hosts in a nicely simple and elegant way, but not
necessarily to meet the needs of every AU host. I'm pretty sure that
Logic does not use AUGraph, but I think it's because of just not being
appropriate for Logic, not because of not being solid enough.
There are a lot of hosts out there using AUGraph, so maybe you'd gleen
more by asking if AUGraph seems solid to those who are using it.
Marc
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>
I am curious if the AUGraph stuff is solid to the point that
>
Apple/Emagic use them (or will use them in the next version) for AU
>
support. I am hoping this is a case where you eat your own dogfood and
>
thus providing us with assurance that the API is sufficient for use in
>
a high end professional product...
>
>
Matthew
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.