Re: man coreaudio (?)
Re: man coreaudio (?)
- Subject: Re: man coreaudio (?)
- From: Chris Reed <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 15:27:30 -0500
That's mostly true, but there are frequently new things in the headers.
Also, there's occasionally documentation that is not in headerdoc form.
(See AudioToolbox/AudioFile.h for an example.)
(I wish Apple could switch to doxygen, but it doesn't yet support
Objective-C. I took a look at adding ObjC support, but it's a huge
amount of work since the parser for all of doxygen's supported
languages is currently mixed into a single flex source file.)
-chris
On Oct 13, 2003, at 7:34 AM, Bill Dozier wrote:
Chris, I don't understand this advice to "read the header files."
Since headerDoc parses them to generate the html documentation, why is
there any useful information in the headers that's not in the docs? If
the answer is headerDoc's limitations, then I would say they should be
using doxygen. Otherwise, the only explanation I can think of is
laziness/sloppiness on the part of the developers for not tagging all
useful info for headerDoc to pick up.
BTW, "man strtok" works for me (see below). Stanko, did you install
the Developer's Tools? I would guess that stuff like "man strtok"
wouldn't be of much use to the average Mac user.
% man strtok
STRTOK(3) System Library Functions Manual
STRTOK(3)
NAME
strtok, strtok_r - string tokens
Bill
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.