Re: ldtox80 in a Carbon Mach-0
Re: ldtox80 in a Carbon Mach-0
- Subject: Re: ldtox80 in a Carbon Mach-0
- From: William Stewart <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 16:02:42 -0700
Have a look at the Audio File API
Bill
On 12/04/2004, at 3:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
Hi,
>
I'm converting my code over from PEF Carbon to Mach-o Carbon, I
>
cannot
>
seem to convert this code, as ldtox80 doesn't seem to be there.
>
>
long double theLongDouble = mWavFormat.nSamplesPerSec;
>
ldtox80 ( &theLongDouble, &mSndInfo.AIFFSampleRate );
>
>
Any ideas what I should be using now for Mach-o as I saw there is
>
dtox80,
>
and I saw that MacOS-X doesn't support long doubles, but this
>
functions is
>
protected by a NO_EXTENSION #define, so not sure how I should be doing
>
this,
>
should I just define that ???.
>
>
One weird thing, which I need to check is that I'm sure that I got
>
this
>
same code through XCode, but I'm using CodeWarrior 8.3 here, so
>
confused why
>
there should be a difference.
>
>
Thanks for any pointers
>
>
Mark.
>
_______________________________________________
>
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
>
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
>
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>
>
--
mailto:email@hidden
tel: +1 408 974 4056
________________________________________________________________________
__
Culture Ship Names:
Ravished By The Sheer Implausibility Of That Last Statement
I said, I've Got A Big Stick [OU]
Inappropiate Response [OU]
Far Over The Borders Of Insanity And Still Accelerating [Eccentric]
________________________________________________________________________
__
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.