Re: auval could be more helpful
Re: auval could be more helpful
- Subject: Re: auval could be more helpful
- From: William Stewart <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 05:00:15 -0800
On 17/12/04 8:24 AM, "Paul Kellett" <email@hidden> wrote:
> I am debugging a plug-in to get it to pass auval, and it's
> giving me messages like:
>
> WARNING: retrievedValue = 0.500000 (was 0.000000),
> Parameter did not retain minimum value when set
This message is prited out with the paramter's information - so you already
have that.
> ERROR: Parameter did not retain set value when Initialized
if (value != param.value) {
sprintf (string, "ParameterID=%ld, Scope=%ld, Element=%ld: Saved
Value = %f, Current Value %f",
param.paramID, param.scope, param.element,
param.value, value);
That information is completely printed out for you - however, if you have
the -q option specified, then you only see the error message and you'll need
to rerun the test without that option.
Bill
>
> As my plug-in has hundreds of parameters, it would be really
> helpful if auval said which parameter it was referring to -
> I'm having to do it the hard way by logging *all* the
> parameter changes and looking for the error!
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul Kellett
>
>
--
mailto:email@hidden
tel: +1 408 974 4056
__________________________________________________________________________
Culture Ship Names:
Ravished By The Sheer Implausibility Of That Last Statement [GSV]
I said, I've Got A Big Stick [OU]
Far Over The Borders Of Insanity And Still Accelerating [Eccentric]
__________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden