Re: Garage Band
Re: Garage Band
- Subject: Re: Garage Band
- From: Robert Grant <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:53:31 -0500
I imagine that Apple's kept it as simple as possible in order to make
it accessible to novices (and not piss off too many competitors ;-))
Certainly looks like a fun tool and something I would have killed for
to have when I was a teenager.
Robert.
On Jan 8, 2004, at 1:01 PM, Andrew Kimpton wrote:
On Jan 8, 2004, at 8:49 AM, Will Benton wrote:
On Jan 8, 2004, at 9:11 AM, Glenn Olander wrote:
Congrats to the Apple guys on Garage Band. Very nicely done!
Perhaps this is just a question for "the Apple guys": What is the
state of GB's AU support? Will it host instruments or just effects?
Can you run Apple Loops through AudioUnit effects? (It wasn't clear
from the website.)
From my brief experimentation at MacWorld yesterday it seems that each
track has an 'inspector' panel that allows you to adjust some of the
settings for the track including such things as the built-in EQ and
also to add a single (it seemed just one) AudioUnit to the track.
There didn't seem to be any automation for the parameters in the
inspector (or the AU) the only automation appeared to be for track and
master Volume.
I didn't notice if you could have a track that's an AU Instrument
though I'd hope that was exactly how the built-in software synth
instruments were being done - any one else notice ?
Andrew 8-)
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.