• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
HALOutputUnit: Nx1 or 1xN
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

HALOutputUnit: Nx1 or 1xN


  • Subject: HALOutputUnit: Nx1 or 1xN
  • From: Austin Shoemaker <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 12:19:47 -0800

What is the performance difference between using one HALOutputUnit mapped to N streams versus N HALOutputUnits each mapped to one of the streams?

How difficult would it be to reconfigure the input format of the output unit and update the channel map to change the number of streams that are running without any audio glitches?** Would it be easier to just have a separate output unit for each independently controllable stream?

There may not be any data on this, but if anyone knows that would be helpful.

Thanks,
Austin

** So if I had 2 streams running to channels 3 and 4, and I wanted to add another 2 streams running to channels 5 and 6, could I do that without start/stop? If not, it is pretty clear that I should use one output unit per stream.
_______________________________________________
coreaudio-api mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/coreaudio-api
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: HALOutputUnit: Nx1 or 1xN
      • From: Doug Wyatt <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Streaming OS X audio over network
  • Next by Date: Changing published parameters list.
  • Previous by thread: Re: HALOutputUnit and multiple streams
  • Next by thread: Re: HALOutputUnit: Nx1 or 1xN
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread