• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Coreaudio-api Digest, Vol 1, Issue 66
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Coreaudio-api Digest, Vol 1, Issue 66


  • Subject: Re: Coreaudio-api Digest, Vol 1, Issue 66
  • From: Os <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 08:37:24 +0000

Hi,

I'm using latest XCode, gcc 3.3, no inline assembly (just compiler intrinsics).

I have some sizeable inlined functions, and very heavy altivec register usage (roll on VMX128) but nothing particularly evil.


cheers, os.

On 8 Nov 2004, at 20:03, email@hidden wrote:

As for the original question, if os is only using inline assembly,
*maybe* gcc lets you sneak through altivec code even if "-faltivec" is
not specified.  The gcc in-line assembly is too grotesque for me to
just try this theory.  :-)  os, what version of the tools are you using
to build your code?

email@hidden
http://www.collective.co.uk/

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Coreaudio-api Digest, Vol 1, Issue 66
      • From: alex <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: XCode 1.5, CA SDK 1.3.1, QT 6.5.2 - update order?
  • Next by Date: Re: XCode 1.5, CA SDK 1.3.1, QT 6.5.2 - update order?
  • Previous by thread: Re: XCode 1.5, CA SDK 1.3.1, QT 6.5.2 - update order?
  • Next by thread: Re: Coreaudio-api Digest, Vol 1, Issue 66
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread