Re: Format mismatch
Re: Format mismatch
- Subject: Re: Format mismatch
- From: kelly jacklin <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:22:38 -0700
On Oct 4, 2004, at 9:12 AM, kelly jacklin wrote:
The way this is typically handled is for the altivec code to run
through loops for the altivec-grained (or even greater, if your
processing is unrolled) part of the buffer, and then run through a
scalar version for the remaining samples. Buffering the data would
involve artificially introducing latency into your AU (which you must
report correctly, for hosts to be able to compensate properly for the
latency you are imposing)...
And in case this wasn't clear, these are two different points... You
do not need to buffer if you handle the loop in two phases as mentioned
(altivec first, then the trailing samples).
If, instead, you decided to take the route of buffering samples, then
you would need to report the latency that you are imposing by doing so.
kelly
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden