• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: I/O latency in Tiger
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: I/O latency in Tiger


  • Subject: Re: I/O latency in Tiger
  • From: William Stewart <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 14:35:22 -0700

The Apple pages actually do not discriminate between Tiger or other versions of Mac OS X, but are rather referring to general features provided by Core Audio.

There have been numerous discussions on this topic on this list and elsewhere, so lets not reiterate those again. In terms of a credible comparison between different OS and Driver models, probably the most reliable, repeatable figures are from a study of about 4 years ago.

Audio Latency Measurements of Desktop Operating Sytsems by

Karl MacMillan, Michael Droettboom, Ichiro Fujinaga
Peabody Institute of the Johns Hopkins University
email: {karlmac,mdboom,ich}@peabody.jhu.edu

You can google this to download the article. As far as I am aware the general figures reported by this study are still basically correct. It was done before there were any 3rd party Audio cards supported on Mac OS X, so built-in audio was used.

As with ASIO and other systems, both the characteristics of the driver, the transport type (USB/FW/PCI), characteristics of the hardware itself, all affect the actual results you can obtain for a given set up. The article does do a good job I believe in describing in general terms the possibilities with the different configurations and OS or API services.

Bill

On 15/04/2005, at 1:27 PM, Frank Vernon wrote:

Hi-

Apologies in advance if this has been covered before but I couldn't find a
definitive answer in the mailing list archives.


I read in the Tiger marketing materials Apple is claiming "ultra-low
latency" for CoreAudio in Tiger. I can find no technical specifications to
support this claim however. Is there anyone here who can clarify exactly
what are the I/O latency characteristics of CoreAudio in Tiger and how
they are calculated? Can anyone point me to documentation on this topic?


Thanks-
Frank Vernon

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


--
mailto:email@hidden
tel: +1 408 974 4056
________________________________________________________________________ __
"Much human ingenuity has gone into finding the ultimate Before.
The current state of knowledge can be summarized thus:
In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded" - Terry Pratchett
________________________________________________________________________ __


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >I/O latency in Tiger (From: "Frank Vernon" <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: I/O latency in Tiger
  • Next by Date: Re: Writing a multi-channel audio recording application
  • Previous by thread: I/O latency in Tiger
  • Next by thread: CFBundleDocumentTypes with audio that QT can play
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread