• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: AudioFile API vs. IMA-in-WAV-type files
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AudioFile API vs. IMA-in-WAV-type files


  • Subject: Re: AudioFile API vs. IMA-in-WAV-type files
  • From: Evan Olcott <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 13:05:22 -0500


On Jun 8, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Doug Wyatt wrote:

Trying to use the CAAudioFile API to read either of these files:


http://www.igorlabs.com/etc/dirtsurface1C.wav

http://www.igorlabs.com/etc/fort_cruise_missile16_11_looped_i.wav


Both of these files read and play with Quicktime Player.


When I ask for the stream format, I get no error return but the stream format comes up cleared out and empty...


The AudioFile apparently doesn't understand the format... you're not doing anything wrong.


$ afinfo /tmp/dirtsurface1c.wav

File:           /tmp/dirtsurface1c.wav

File type ID:   WAVE

Data format:     0 ch,      0 Hz, '    ' (0x00000000) 0 bits/channel, 0 bytes/packet, 0 frames/packet, 0 bytes/frame

                no channel layout.

audio bytes: 2816

audio packets: 2

maximum packet size: 1024

packet size upper bound: 1024

audio data file offset: 60


OK, that makes sense then!

Is this bug-report-worthy, or is it not in the plan to support this file type?

-ev

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: AudioFile API vs. IMA-in-WAV-type files
      • From: "Isaac Wankerl" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >AudioFile API vs. IMA-in-WAV-type files (From: Evan Olcott <email@hidden>)
 >Re: AudioFile API vs. IMA-in-WAV-type files (From: Doug Wyatt <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: AudioFile API vs. IMA-in-WAV-type files
  • Next by Date: Re: AudioFile API vs. IMA-in-WAV-type files
  • Previous by thread: Re: AudioFile API vs. IMA-in-WAV-type files
  • Next by thread: Re: AudioFile API vs. IMA-in-WAV-type files
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread