• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: sin() optimization on PowerPC and Intel
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sin() optimization on PowerPC and Intel


  • Subject: Re: sin() optimization on PowerPC and Intel
  • From: Bob Lang <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:38:35 +0100

Hi

If you're looking for fast execution speed then I'd be tempted to set up a large array and use it to store pre-computed sine values. This converts each calculation into a simple and fast look up operation. Of course, you only need to store one quarter of the cycle as the remaining three quarters can be easily obtained from the stored first quarter.

If you hold (say) 900 separate points, then you can store each sample to a precision of 0.1 degree, which may already be sufficiently accurate for your application. Obviously, you can get better accuracy by using a bigger array and/or using a simple linear interpolation technique on two adjacent samples.

Bob
--
On 26 Jun 2006, at 16:37, Artemiy Pavlov wrote:

Hello all!

I have the following problem. XCode 2.2, Mac OS 10.4.6 on Intel.

I created a sin() function replacement using four first members of the Taylor series - works perfectly like the standard sin() (the thing is that I need a very pure sine for FM purposes, so other models do not work ear-wise).

But the thing is that it doesn't work any faster than the standard sin() function... It's not optimized with assembly language, but anyway has no division operations and all coefficients are pre- computed. I heard that on Intels the sin() function is actually implemented in CPU instructions, and that is why it works so fast. Is this true?

So the question is - should I determine the CPU type for my universal app and use sin() on Intel and custom sin() on PPC? If so, are there any #define's available to be able to branch the code?

Thanks!


All the best,

Artemiy Pavlov
Sineshine http://sineshine.com



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40blueyonder.co.uk


This email sent to email@hidden



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: sin() optimization on PowerPC and Intel
      • From: "Andy O'Meara" <email@hidden>
References: 
 >sin() optimization on PowerPC and Intel (From: Artemiy Pavlov <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: render inNumberFrames vs. pre/postRender inNumberFrames
  • Next by Date: sending sound to device
  • Previous by thread: Re: sin() optimization on PowerPC and Intel
  • Next by thread: Re: sin() optimization on PowerPC and Intel
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread