• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
HAL vs. AU Output: Performance?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

HAL vs. AU Output: Performance?


  • Subject: HAL vs. AU Output: Performance?
  • From: Lubor Prikryl DS <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:32:01 +0200

Hello,

I have used a direct access to the HAL for years, several months ago we moved to AU input/output. The only thing which is much worse is performance - the Output AU consumes a lot of CPU power. It seems to perform some oversampling or format conversion, when checking in Shark. But I don't need any sample rate change there, the input and output sample rates are the same.

Is there anything what could be changed to decrease the CPU load of the output unit? I think the ComplexPlayThru has the same problem.

Thanks for any advice...

Lubor



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: HAL vs. AU Output: Performance?
      • From: Jeff Moore <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: writing a file from the output of the mixer
  • Next by Date: ExtendedAudioFile problems
  • Previous by thread: Re: writing a file from the output of the mixer
  • Next by thread: Re: HAL vs. AU Output: Performance?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread