• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC


  • Subject: Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
  • From: "Mikael Hakman" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:30:52 +0100
  • Organization: Datakonsulten AB

On January 31, 2008 8:54 PM Brian Willoughby wrote:

...I have long planned on developing a sample-
rate following player.

I have long been missing such a rate following player that could be used with today's best audio interfaces which include but are not limited to Benchmark.

On January 31, 2008 Stephen Davis wrote:

IMHO, it is bad form to be changing the audio hardware's sample rate
for each track.  If you're gunning for the absolute highest quality
output then maybe it's okay but it's pretty obnoxious to the rest of
the system and should be clearly communicated to the user.

Would you or other knowledgeable member on this thread kindly explain why rate-following would be bad, in absence of other rate-locking signals such as digital input or word clock etc., please?


Why couldn't e.g. iTunes send the actual sample rate information down the chain of software layers until it arrives to the hardware (DAC)? The sample rate would need to be changed only when the rate used by the actual track is different from previous. I have been discussing this with few audio interface vendors. While they agree that not doing SRC would be the best, they blame on application and operating system vendors for not providing sample rate information to their drivers/hardware.

For a user it is difficult if not impossible to keep track of what sample rate a selected media is in, then use a control panel or Preferences or both to change the rate, and first then to play the track. Many users want to simply select a track, perhaps in Front Row using a remote control from the couch, and play it, or even play a number of randomly selected tracks. Why can't we give even these users the best audio quality available on the system?

Mikael Hakman

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
      • From: Brian Willoughby <email@hidden>
    • Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
      • From: Rick Sustek <email@hidden>
    • Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
      • From: Jeff Moore <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Quality of CoreAudio SRC (From: Brian Willoughby <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC (From: Stephen Davis <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
  • Next by Date: Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
  • Previous by thread: Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
  • Next by thread: Re: Quality of CoreAudio SRC
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread