Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Java CoreMIDI vs javax.sound vs MMJ etc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Java CoreMIDI vs javax.sound vs MMJ etc

Subject: Re: Java CoreMIDI vs javax.sound vs MMJ etc
From: Jason Proctor <email@hidden>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:02:43 -0700

i've had a few private responses to this post which seem to indicate quite clearly that the installation of MMJ (or equivalent) as a provider is necessary for operation of the javax.sound.midi package beyond furtling with the default synthesizer & sequencer etc.

Apple replaced the Java interface to CoreMIDI, which worked fine, with this? er, wtf?

this situation, together with others i've encountered recently, is making me start to seriously doubt Apple's commitment to Java.

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Java CoreMIDI vs javax.sound vs MMJ etc
From: Normen Hansen <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Java CoreMIDI vs javax.sound vs MMJ etc (From: Jason Proctor <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Java CoreMIDI vs javax.sound vs MMJ etc (From: William Stewart <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Java CoreMIDI vs javax.sound vs MMJ etc (From: Jason Proctor <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: Java CoreMIDI vs javax.sound vs MMJ etc

Next by Date:
Re: Enable system volume when driver doesn't

Previous by thread:
Re: Java CoreMIDI vs javax.sound vs MMJ etc

Next by thread:
Re: Java CoreMIDI vs javax.sound vs MMJ etc

Index(es):

Date
Thread