soundflower vs audioreflector
soundflower vs audioreflector
- Subject: soundflower vs audioreflector
- From: Iain McCowan <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 16:09:30 +1000
Can anyone comment on the relative technical (not licensing) merits of using Soundflower or the Apple AudioReflectorDriver in a project, in terms of stability, latency, timing accuracy, etc?
I expected Soundflower might be the better one as a more significant project, but then thought perhaps the AudioReflectorDriver sample would be simpler and be better with the latest SDKs as the Apple team updated it last year.
I have done some tests myself and seem to periodically get some brief noises when using the ReflectorDriver, possibly related to timing issues. The build of Soundflower I have seems to sound cleaner than this over a long period, at least on my macbook running 10.6.4.
But on the Soundflower Google Code project I note a few recent issues have been logged with not so much activity in response.
Anyone have a strong opinion or advice regarding this?
thanks,
Iain.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden