Re: latency on sidechain bus
Re: latency on sidechain bus
- Subject: Re: latency on sidechain bus
- From: Stefan Huber <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:28:15 +0100
Indeed, it makes it harder to use. In some cases however, this is rather true for the user than for the developer.
I am currently thinking about either,
- supplying an additional plug-in that does nothing but returning the correct latency which has to be placed in the sidechain channel (assuming logic still doesn't care if another channel uses this channel as a sidechain)
- not using latency compensation at all (but who wants to use plug-ins that mess with your timing these days?)
- or not using sidechains , which however would prevent me from releasing a working stereo version of my plug-in for logic. I need 4 inputs for a stereo version, and using sidechains is the only bearable way to do that in logic.
However, I will check if anything has changed in logic 9. I am still running version 8. So I ll have to do some tests on someones machine, who is using logic 9.
On Jan 28, 2011, at 11:33 AM, email@hidden wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Kevin Dixon <email@hidden> wrote:
>> Doesn't this make a sidechain rather worthless? Especially if you are
>> trying to trigger a de-esser or something
>
> it doesn't make it worthless. it makes it harder to use if you use
> latent plugins on a bus.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden