• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Max simultaneous source count with Remote I/O Callback much lower than with OpenAL
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Max simultaneous source count with Remote I/O Callback much lower than with OpenAL


  • Subject: Re: Max simultaneous source count with Remote I/O Callback much lower than with OpenAL
  • From: Michael Tyson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:00:42 +0100

Wow, that's an impressive difference - I wasn't expecting that level of improvement!

Ah, of course, vDSP_vlint looks perfect - good find.

Cheers =)
Michael


On 12 Feb 2012, at 15:43, Hari Karam Singh wrote:

Many many thanks Michael.  You’re subsequent question about convolution actually tipped me off to the Accelerate framework.  A preliminary reworking of the callback shows that I can play 20 unpitched sources with only 6% CPU usage instead of 12 taking 100%.  Wow!    
 
As far as pitch, I think it can be done easily using the interpolation function vDSP_vlint()...
 
I’m trying to keep it in the callback so I can run a limiter algorithm (eg http://www.musicdsp.org/showone.php?id=265) to better handle clipping...something I think you mentioned in your blog post on summing audio.  I’ll share my results if I can get it working.
 
Thanks again!
Gratefully,
Hari Karam Singh
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • RE: Max simultaneous source count with Remote I/O Callback much lower than with OpenAL
      • From: Hari Karam Singh <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Max simultaneous source count with Remote I/O Callback much lower than with OpenAL (From: Hari Karam Singh <email@hidden>)
 >RE: Max simultaneous source count with Remote I/O Callback much lower than with OpenAL (From: Hari Karam Singh <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Threading Question
  • Next by Date: Re: Threading Question
  • Previous by thread: RE: Max simultaneous source count with Remote I/O Callback much lower than with OpenAL
  • Next by thread: RE: Max simultaneous source count with Remote I/O Callback much lower than with OpenAL
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread