• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: achieving very low latency
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: achieving very low latency


  • Subject: Re: achieving very low latency
  • From: Paul Davis <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 10:48:56 -0400



On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Markus Fritze <email@hidden> wrote:
Any current Mac supports 16 sample buffer settings and it works just fine.

the buffer setting and the actual playback latency are not equivalent, even ignoring D/A issues. until the driver layer removes the safety buffer, this will always be the case.

i'm also not as confident of the claim that 16 samples always works as you seem to be. its also not as relevant as it might appear because there is a lot of audio interface h/w that doesn't support this setting.
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: achieving very low latency
      • From: William Stewart <email@hidden>
References: 
 >achieving very low latency (From: Daphne Ippolito <email@hidden>)
 >Re: achieving very low latency (From: Paul Davis <email@hidden>)
 >Re: achieving very low latency (From: Daphne Ippolito <email@hidden>)
 >Re: achieving very low latency (From: Robert Martin <email@hidden>)
 >Re: achieving very low latency (From: Daphne Ippolito <email@hidden>)
 >Re: achieving very low latency (From: Paul Davis <email@hidden>)
 >Re: achieving very low latency (From: Peter April <email@hidden>)
 >RE: achieving very low latency (From: Hari Karam Singh <email@hidden>)
 >Re: achieving very low latency (From: Markus Fritze <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: achieving very low latency
  • Next by Date: Re: achieving very low latency
  • Previous by thread: Re: achieving very low latency
  • Next by thread: Re: achieving very low latency
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread