Re: Automation accuracy?
Re: Automation accuracy?
- Subject: Re: Automation accuracy?
- From: Howard Moon <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:31:06 -0700
Yes, an indexed parameter sounds like it would work. I'll look into that solution. (I might need a few of them to handle the number of bits I need to capture.)
Thanks,
-Howard
On Apr 17, 2014, at 12:59 PM, Ian Kemmish <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On 17 Apr 2014, at 10:55, Howard Moon <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> When automating parameters, is there a way to make sure that the bits of a given parameter are retained EXACTLY? We're thinking of automating some information that would require that we capture an EXACT bit pattern in the parameter's value, and be sure that it retains that value in ALL cases. Is this guaranteed? Is it *possible*?
>
>
> It depends on whether you mean "do I get back exactly the same float?" or "can I store and retrieve an arbitrary bit pattern?"
>
> If the latter, then one or more "indexed" parameters would let you send an arbitrarily long integer / bit pattern. I don't know if that helps.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Ian Kemmish 18 Durham Close, Biggleswade, Beds SG18 8HZ
> email@hidden Tel: +44 1767 601361 Mob: +44 7952 854387
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden