Re: Trouble recording using the AUHAL unit.
Re: Trouble recording using the AUHAL unit.
- Subject: Re: Trouble recording using the AUHAL unit.
- From: Alexander Bollbach <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:09:42 +0000
So I've actually read that a few days ago. i guess because the function was a core audio i didn't make the connection that it was i/o accessing. but right, i do recall that i/o restriction in the callback. What do you think was happening? it was only writing a a fraction of the total frame bytes before the callback returned? how do you account for the fact that the resultant wav file was long and shorter based on how long i ran the program?
anyway, now that I know this won't work, what is the right approach? Do I need to fill up a buffer in RAM and than start to offload those bytes into the audiofile back on a non-realtime thread?
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:36 AM Paul Davis <
email@hidden> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden