Re: kAudioUnitProperty_Latency property changes and Logic
Re: kAudioUnitProperty_Latency property changes and Logic
- Subject: Re: kAudioUnitProperty_Latency property changes and Logic
- From: Howard Moon <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 14:27:35 -0700
Hi Paul, thanks for the reply.
So, for our change to take affect in your hosts, the user would have to make the change in our plug-in, start the transport, and then STOP it again before the change was picked up? Not the best scenario from our users’ point of view, but at least that is something we can tell users who inquire.
Thanks!
-Howard
On May 31, 2016, at 2:14 PM, Paul Davis < email@hidden> wrote:
I can answer on behalf of Ardour and Mixbus.
We don't pay attention to Property_Latency because we are not willing to deal with the plugin invoking such a change at arbitary times. We check latency at times when we are willing to deal with having changed, and ignore "asynchronous" changes caused at other times. In our case, we specifically check at transport stop (not transport start, since we don't wish to emulate the "slow-start" behaviour of other well-known DAWs, at least historically). So, you can send your notifications, but in our case, we aren't interested. We'll pick up your provided value when we are.
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Coreaudio-api mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden