Re: -fno-leading-underscore
Re: -fno-leading-underscore
- Subject: Re: -fno-leading-underscore
- From: Godfrey van der Linden <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 10:55:51 -0800
I'm missing something. Wouldn't it be a whole lot easier to change the
lisp code that calls a foreign function to prepend an '_' than it is to
recompile every thing you ever attempt to call. wouldn't that mean
that you can never access any system libraries? That seems somewhat
limiting.
Godfrey
On Nov 16, , at 13:53, Michael Hogsett wrote:
The -fno-leading-underscore to GCC appears to have no effect.
We have some lisp code which calls foreign functions. The foreign
function calls fail because all of the symbols have an underscore
prepended to their name.
e.g.
[dh-7-13] [hogsett] [~]
--> gcc -fno-leading-underscore -c -o foo.o foo.c
[dh-7-13] [hogsett] [~]
--> nm foo.o
0000003c b _b.0
00000000 T _foo
[dh-7-13] [hogsett] [~]
--> gcc -c -o foo.o foo.c
[dh-7-13] [hogsett] [~]
--> nm foo.o
0000003c b _b.0
00000000 T _foo
How do I resolve this other than rewriting our lisp code? This does
not occur on Solaris, Linux, or FreeBSD.
- Mike
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden