Re: Re[2]: Preprocesor?
Re: Re[2]: Preprocesor?
- Subject: Re: Re[2]: Preprocesor?
- From: Justin Walker <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 21:19:36 -0800
On Nov 27, 2004, at 20:01, Igor Shmukler wrote:
you are using (".c" for C; ".cc" or ".cpp" for C++; etc. There
are
generally
well-accepted extensions for these files, so it makes sense to
follow those
conventions.)
Helping out someone is great. You are a nice person.
My mom always said so, but it's good to have it validated :-}
However, .cc is depricated. As far as I know standard says it has to
be .cpp.
I have no idea what the standard says, so I'm just going on the
strength of history.
In general a language standard covers naming format. Personally, I
would just like you suggest to use plain-text. If vi(1) is not be
happy with it, we cannot call this a real "C" source.
Agreed.
Regards,
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large *
Institute for General Semantics | It's not whether you win or
lose...
| It's whether *I* win or lose.
*--------------------------------------*-------------------------------*
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden