Re: APSL 2.0 vs. APSL 1.x
Re: APSL 2.0 vs. APSL 1.x
- Subject: Re: APSL 2.0 vs. APSL 1.x
- From: "David N. Williams" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:29:45 -0500
- Organization: University of Michigan
<email@hidden> wrote:
[...]
On Feb 8, 2005, at 12:05 PM, David N. Williams wrote:
Am I correct that APSL 2.0 can indeed be used with complex.c?
Hi David,
While only your lawyer can give you a definitive answer, in principle
any code covered by the APSL 1.1 may be redistributed under the terms
of the APSL 2.0.
The comments at the top of the complex.c file are a "license header"
which are not the full license, but contain a reference to it. The
relevant section of the APSL 1.1 states[1]:
7. Versions of the License. Apple may publish revised and/or new
versions of this License from time to time. Each version will be given
a distinguishing version number. Once Original Code has been published
under a particular version of this License, You may continue to use it
under the terms of that version. You may also choose to use such
Original Code under the terms of any subsequent version of this
License published by Apple. No one other than Apple has the right to
modify the terms applicable to Covered Code created under this
License.
Thanks! I don't know how I managed to miss that, being normally
obsessive/compulsive about checking such things. I refuse to
invoke a senior moment ... (blush)
-- David
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden