Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: bad fsync? (A.M.)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bad fsync? (A.M.)

Subject: Re: bad fsync? (A.M.)
From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:14:16 +0100


On 22 feb 2005, at 10:08, Mike Smith wrote:

If you were to use those platforms' functionality (where avaialble) to force a full push to disk, you would see similar performance regressions.

Doesn't this behaviour also mean that the "safety" provided by journaling is basically not there? Or does the journaling code use something similar to F_FULLFSYNC to ensure that everything gets written do disk in the right order?


Jonas

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >Re: bad fsync? (A.M.) (From: Mike Smith <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: bad fsync? (A.M.)

Next by Date:
Re: Threads problems

Previous by thread:
Re: bad fsync? (A.M.)

Next by thread:
Re: bad fsync? (A.M.)

Index(es):

Date
Thread