Re: Tiger speed issues...
Re: Tiger speed issues...
- Subject: Re: Tiger speed issues...
- From: Peter Bierman <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:57:07 -0700
At 9:51 AM +1000 5/15/05, email@hidden wrote:
Is this due to the fact the Tiger kernel is 64 bit based and G4
processors are not? Or that I have 256MB RAM instead of 1GB?
Bingo - the RAM, that is. Tiger is, as with every new incarnation
of MacOS X, even more RAM hungry than the previous version.
Actually, if you take some measurements, you will find that Tiger
uses LESS memory to get from boot to the Finder than 10.3.9 does.
But yes, 256 MB is the suggested minimum, and as such will feel
sluggish compared to larger amounts.
-pmb
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden