Re: __builtin_frame_address()
Re: __builtin_frame_address()
- Subject: Re: __builtin_frame_address()
- From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 12:39:19 -0700
On May 25, 2005, at 7:57 PM, Steve Checkoway wrote:
Is __builtin_frame_address() broken? I have some backtracing code
that walks the stack essentially using:
By the lack of response here, I suspect that this might be the wrong
list to ask. Can someone suggest a better one?
On a slightly related note, the first few values that frame->lr
holds are in unrelated functions that are not on the stack at the
time. This is new in gcc 4. Prior versions seemed to provide sane
addresses. After the first few functions, the stack seems correct.
As a follow up to this, the addresses are correct, it was my address
to symbol lookup that for some reason isn't working any more.
- Steve
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden