Re: catching EXC_BAD_ACCESS?
Re: catching EXC_BAD_ACCESS?
- Subject: Re: catching EXC_BAD_ACCESS?
- From: "Peter O'Gorman" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:06:29 +0900
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jonas Maebe wrote:
|
| PS: is it expected that "otool -L" fails on 64 bit programs? I get
use otool64 -L
Yes, I know...
Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBQ4HidLiDAg3OZTLPAQJpVwP/TbP0HGMLBKGSFuGawbEUnpnzcmIAkxrZ
KQ7lzZLh1wudaWHz8/0EE0/4W2jmZ4snAmn4F4N6hpZxMoQL72hZ8WWZgvplpf9f
py3woEaJ9Wbe5PlorWbSOmlIqPJuzueHPGkqAHGdk3Bde+rdBxmX8c7ov1zpaCP6
tRi7Fth4oO4=
=4XgA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden