• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Intel XNU bug report
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Intel XNU bug report


  • Subject: Re: Intel XNU bug report
  • From: Chad Leigh <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:53:09 -0600


On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:09 PM, Eric Albert wrote:

On Aug 8, 2006, at 1:55 PM, almisr wrote:

Mike has implemented ACPI 2 standard in IA-64 for Darwin,

By the way, IA-64 is the name Intel uses for Itanium, which Darwin does not support. We've been using "Intel 64-bit" or "x86-64" for our latest architecture.

Sun I think uses x64 which is kind of a nice shorthand for x86-64. A lot of people like FreeBSD use amd64 since AMD fathered the particular 64bit architecture which intel copied.


Would be nice if Darwin/Apple etc used a name that is already in use by others so a to not offer more confusion.

But IA-64 is Itanium in most people's mind, that I agree with.

Chad



-Eric

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40objectwerks.com


This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Intel XNU bug report
      • From: Graham J Lee <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Intel XNU bug report (From: almisr <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Intel XNU bug report (From: Eric Albert <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Ordering of static destructors on exit
  • Next by Date: Re: Intel XNU bug report
  • Previous by thread: Re: Intel XNU bug report
  • Next by thread: Re: Intel XNU bug report
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread