Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE as alternative for sem_init()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE as alternative for sem_init()

Subject: Re: PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE as alternative for sem_init()
From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 10:51:17 +0100


On 20 dec 2006, at 22:28, Jonas Maebe wrote:

Since Darwin does not support nameless semaphores (sem_init), I'm considering using recursive mutexes instead. Are there any semantical differences between the two?

A: yes, you can only unlock a mutex from the thread that locked it. So I guess my only options are nameless pipes and named semaphores.


Jonas
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden



References:  
  >PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE as alternative for sem_init() (From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE as alternative for sem_init()

Next by Date:
Help with debugging a trace

Previous by thread:
PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE as alternative for sem_init()

Next by thread:
Help with debugging a trace

Index(es):

Date
Thread