Re: usefulness of source
Re: usefulness of source
- Subject: Re: usefulness of source
- From: Bill Northcott <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:34:05 +1100
On 24/02/2006, at 7:03 AM, email@hidden wrote:
It makes me sad to not be back in the good old days (which
apparently were
even more good before I came into this picture) but time moves on,
relationships change and the way I work with Mac OS X has as well.
I've
really gone back to linux and FreeBSD and other far more esoteric
operating
systems for my OS experimentation fun. Just as Apple seemingly
left me
behind, I've moved on as well.
I think this is bit like the time that Scott McNealy said something
like "You have no privacy. Get over it."
I still think it's a bit of a shame but Apple's a business and
needs to do
what they think is right for them and their stakeholders first.
I have my suspicions that what is the core of all this is Hollywood
and the record companies, who seem to have persuaded the US
legislature to enact pernicious legislation the sole purpose of which
is to greatly increase the profits of the large multi nationals that
control entertainment. Going forward, if Apple want to continue to
produce systems that handle vision and music, they will need to have
DRM (Digital Restrictions Management) built into the core of the
system including but not limited to the kernel. Of course they have
some self-interest here: not wanting MacOS to run on ordinary PCs,
although that could probably have been done at a higher level in
proprietary code which has never been part of Darwin.
They are presumably not going to bother with this for the PPC
hardware which is why there is no problem with those sources.
However, to release the x86 sources, they need a methodology to strip
any DRM related code out before release. This is presumably a non-
trivial task. Hence the delay. Apple don't want to be seen as having
leaked vital information for hackers.
Ars Technica had a really good article this week berating the
computer and home entertainment industries for putting up with all
this strife from a content industry that is a fraction of their
size. After all the hardware companies could club together and go
into business making content. They could pay the artists more and
release products free of mindless DRM junk. I reckon that might
bring Hollywood into line.
Bill Northcott
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden