Re: usefulness of source
Re: usefulness of source
- Subject: Re: usefulness of source
- From: Graham J Lee <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:47:38 +0000
On 24/2/06 03:42, Chris Thomas wrote:
On Feb 23, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Amanda Walker wrote:
Profit motive, not OCD, I assure you ;-).
Second that. Especially because kernel documentation is nonexistent, the
source is necessary for driver development. (Although I've long wondered
whether making the source available was just an excuse to avoid
providing adequate kernel documentation.)
At one point (and it may indeed still be the case) Apple were soliciting
third-party headerdoc, manpages and HOWTOs for Darwin including KPI
documentation. IIRC they even had an email address set up for submissions.
--
Graham Lee
UNIX Systems Manager,
Oxford Physics Practical Course
http://users.ox.ac.uk/~wadh1342
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden