Re: MoreBacktrace for i386?
Re: MoreBacktrace for i386?
- Subject: Re: MoreBacktrace for i386?
- From: Andrew Pinski <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:53:34 -0500
On Jan 20, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Eric Albert wrote:
Mac OS X doesn't support DWARF yet and the compiler doesn't omit frame
pointers (though you can write asm functions which omit them), so for
now regular backtracing code will work fine in nearly all cases.
Unfortunately, MoreBacktrace should handle all cases, not nearly all,
so it'll take a little bit longer before it's ready.
Actually the compiler does emit enough dwarf2 to do this as you only
need the
information from -fasynchronous-unwind-tables which is the same
information that is
used for undwinding from exceptions.
-- Pinski
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden