Re: dlsym(...) and Intel Macs
Re: dlsym(...) and Intel Macs
- Subject: Re: dlsym(...) and Intel Macs
- From: Damien Sorresso <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:29:27 -0500
On 17 Jul, 2006, at 10:16 PM, Eric Albert wrote:
On Jul 17, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Damien Sorresso wrote:
No, they're two separate binaries. (Trust me there's a good reason
for this.)
I hate to say this, but I don't quite trust you on that. :) What's
the reason? I've seen an awful lot of cases over the past year
where folks thought they needed separate binaries but I've yet to
see one which actually did. Maybe you'll be the first....
Because the application I'm writing has to run on all versions of
Panther, down to 10.3.0. (Part of its function is to make sure the
user is up-to-date on point releases.) To compile a universal binary,
you need to use gcc 4.0, and in order to run applications compiled
with gcc 4.0, you must be running 10.3.9.
How's that work for you? :)
--
Damien Sorresso
Mac OS X Developer
Computer Infrastructure Support Services
Illinois State University
E-mail: email@hidden
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden