Re: Universal binaries and X11
Re: Universal binaries and X11
- Subject: Re: Universal binaries and X11
- From: Graham J Lee <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:08:53 +0000
On 3 Mar 2006, at 16:57, André-John Mas wrote:
Hi,
From what I have heard X11 fails miserably with Rosetta on the new
Intel Macs.
Is this something to do with the way Rosetta handles things, or the
way the
libraries that X11 are implemented.
It's something to do with the rumours sources you use; X11 and
rosetta seems to function rather well for me (using an Intel iMac
with a PPC windowmaker, rxvt, glxgears, idlde and gimp all appear to
work). I'd recommend you just pick up an el cheapo Intel Mini, and
test the apps you're expecting to use...
Also, is it possible to implement unix tools as universal binaries?
leeg@blatand:~>file `which cp`
/bin/cp: Mach-O universal binary with 2 architectures
/bin/cp (for architecture i386): Mach-O executable i386
/bin/cp (for architecture ppc): Mach-O executable ppc
Cheers,
Graham.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden