• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Why no work on rsync?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why no work on rsync?


  • Subject: Re: Why no work on rsync?
  • From: "Finlay Dobbie" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 18:00:13 +0000

On 3/4/06, Peter Seebach <email@hidden> wrote:
> In message <email@hidden>, Dave Schroeder
>  writes:
> >And have these changes been submitted back to the rsync maintainers?
> >Or are they really not interested in this? (And I'm really genuinely
> >curious when I ask this...)
>
> I have a hard time imagining anyone but Apple ever caring about resource
> forks.  The inconsistency with the fundamental UNIX file model is simply
> too great.

Not to mention, I believe the implementation uses SPI and as a result
isn't even buildable out of the box (needs private Darwin headers,
builds with darwinbuild fine though).

 -- Finlay
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Why no work on rsync?
      • From: Martin Costabel <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Why no work on rsync? (From: Dave Schroeder <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Why no work on rsync? (From: email@hidden (Peter Seebach))

  • Prev by Date: Are there bugs in gnutar when using -N with -X?
  • Next by Date: Re: Why no work on rsync?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Why no work on rsync?
  • Next by thread: Re: Why no work on rsync?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread