Re: Fuse
Re: Fuse
- Subject: Re: Fuse
- From: Graham J Lee <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 01:07:54 +0100
On 16 May 2007, at 22:39, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
On May 16, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Dan Shoop wrote:
As we all know FUSE is a project to implement ad-hoc filesystems
in user space. Ad-hoc filesystems are, by nature, not readily
suitable for production. Hence my comment. Furthermore if the
filesystem was production quality it would most likely be
implemented within the system, not a user application. User based
applications don't lend themselves well as production services.
That's a rather broad categorization to make and, as such, not
really supportable.
There are many instances where putting a filesystem in user space
is a good idea:
BTW [to the list, not necessarily to JKH] - check out the HURD, where
almost any problem can be fixed by recompiling and restarting some
user-land process. There's a kernel-space module for e2fs, but that
just brings the system up to a point where it can launch the
userspace e2fs translator and get on with some real work ;-) On a
PPC Mac, it'd be easy to imagine a scenario where the system only
relies on the Open Firmware HFS+ reader until it's loaded a userspace
HFS+ translator.
Cheers,
Graham.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
References: | |
| >Fuse (From: Andre-John Mas <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Fuse (From: Dan Shoop <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Fuse (From: Filipe Cabecinhas <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Fuse (From: Dan Shoop <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Fuse (From: Uli Kusterer <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Fuse (From: Dan Shoop <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: Fuse (From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <email@hidden>) |