Re: Fuse
Re: Fuse
- Subject: Re: Fuse
- From: Dan Shoop <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 08:05:53 -0400
At 11:14 PM +0200 5/18/07, Uli Kusterer wrote:
On 16.05.2007, at 19:44, Dan Shoop wrote:
It's further clear that ad-hoc filesystems are anathema to production.
O RLY? Elaborate :-)
Production is about maintaining and running operations according to
set service levels using established procedures and methods.
Ad-hoc operations are not established or standard operating methods.
That places the two rather at opposites.
--
-dhan
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Shoop AIM: iWiring
Systems & Networks Architect http://www.ustsvs.com/
email@hidden http://www.iwiring.net/
1-714-363-1174
"The wise man doesn't give the right answers, he poses the right
questions." -- Claude Levi-Strauss
------------------------------------------------------------------------
iWiring provides systems and networks support for Mac OS X, unix, and
Open Source application technologies at affordable rates.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fuse
- From: Amanda Walker <email@hidden>
- Re: Fuse
- From: Mo McRoberts <email@hidden>
| References: | |
| | >Fuse (From: Andre-John Mas <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Fuse (From: Dan Shoop <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Fuse (From: Filipe Cabecinhas <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Fuse (From: Dan Shoop <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Fuse (From: Uli Kusterer <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Fuse (From: Dan Shoop <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: Fuse (From: Uli Kusterer <email@hidden>) |