• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [Fwd: Re: execv bug???]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Re: execv bug???]


  • Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: execv bug???]
  • From: email@hidden (Peter Seebach)
  • Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:34:05 -0600

In message <email@hidden>, Jonas Maebe wr
ites:
>If it only hurt performance a bit I would never have changed the code
>from using fork (which is what we used on all other *nix ports) into
>using vfork in the first place. But a 25% to 40% slowdown caused by
>173 system calls in the process of compiling about 180 kloc is
>astronomical in my view.

It does seem unusually large, and I'd be interested in seeing what caused it.

-s
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Fwd: Re: execv bug???]
      • From: Andrew Gallatin <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: [Fwd: Re: execv bug???] (From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: execv bug???]
  • Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: Re: execv bug???]
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: execv bug???]
  • Next by thread: Re: [Fwd: Re: execv bug???]
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread