• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: setuid for priv sockets?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: setuid for priv sockets?


  • Subject: Re: setuid for priv sockets?
  • From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:37:08 -0700


On Oct 27, 2008, at 4:11 PM, Brian Mastenbrook wrote:

I do agree that implementing setuid binaries is tricky, and the ordinary (or even extraordinary) developer can't be trusted to do it correctly. The alternative is not to do something worse simply because it's easier. I wish Apple would throw some of its copious billions at actually improving the situation. What's needed is a very fine grained set of capabilities, along with the ability to selectively grant those capabilities to an application at either installation or execution time (with corresponding limitations on the ability to influence the execution environment ala the existing restrictions for setuid binaries). Instead we are marching headlong down a path of desensitizing the users to constant authentication dialogs. This way lies Windows.

What you're describing is widely known as "capabilities". A fine grained authorization model certainly beats the one, big "are you root or not?" hammer, to be sure, but it's hardly some panacea. Now you have to figure out how to confer all those little capabilities in their various combinations onto user accounts (since the notion of "are you admin or not?" is only "are you root or not?" under a different label). You need to figure out how to grant a specific capability to a specific (presumably signed) binary since making it setuid anything is also now too coarse grained. You need to figure out how to acquire those individual rights at runtime for a user with the right password / smart card / other authentication device without creating an entirely new profusion of user dialogs since all usage scenarios don't conform to being able to know up-front that you're going to need capability X for binary Y.


If it were all particularly easy, we'd have done it already.

- Jordan

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: setuid for priv sockets?
      • From: Brian Mastenbrook <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: setuid for priv sockets? (From: Stephen Hoffman <email@hidden>)
 >Re: setuid for priv sockets? (From: "Duane Murphy" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: setuid for priv sockets? (From: Brian Mastenbrook <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: setuid for priv sockets?
  • Next by Date: Re: setuid for priv sockets?
  • Previous by thread: Re: setuid for priv sockets?
  • Next by thread: Re: setuid for priv sockets?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread