Re: Loading Kernel Extension
Re: Loading Kernel Extension
- Subject: Re: Loading Kernel Extension
- From: Tim Murison <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:40:28 -0400
- Thread-topic: Loading Kernel Extension
> What is the reason why you don't want to use kextload?
I generally prefer not invoking a utility from within my own program unless
I have to. It strikes me as an ugly way of performing a task.
If there is no other way then I'll invoke kextload, I was just hoping for an
overlooked API.
***********************************************************************
This e-mail and its attachments are confidential, legally privileged, may be subject to copyright and sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s).
Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. Statements and opinions expressed in this e-mail may not represent those of Radialpoint.
Le contenu de ce courriel est confidentiel, privilégié et peut être soumis à des droits d'auteur. Il est envoyé à l'intention exclusive de son ou de ses
destinataires. Il est interdit de l'utiliser ou de le divulguer sans autorisation. Les opinions exprimées dans le présent courriel peuvent diverger de celles de Radialpoint.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden