• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: 2048 bug
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2048 bug


  • Subject: Re: 2048 bug
  • From: Esteban Bodigami <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:59:03 -0600

paranoid is a level of security.
this is the third message (from daemons) of this kind:

Mailing list removal confirmation notice for mailing list Darwin-dev

We have received a request for the removal of your email address,
"email@hidden" from the email@hidden
mailing list.  To confirm that you want to be removed from this
mailing list, simply reply to this message, keeping the Subject:
header intact.  Or visit this web page:

i didn't requested the removal of this e-mail adress from this mailing list.
someone may be trying to remove me from this list...
but "i don't care" (hears Apocalyptica's song)

2552/7/13 Kevin Van Vechten <email@hidden>

From: Esteban Bodigami <email@hidden>
Date: July 13, 2009 11:16:33 AM PDT
To: email@hidden, email@hidden
Subject: 2048 bug

Esteban,

It is best not to cross-post between multiple lists in general, and in this case the email address used (email@hidden) is not valid.

thanks for the tip,
honestly { maitri ^^ }
 
cann't we just count the minutes after the 1st of January of 1970 instead of seconds after it?

No.  In general it is not possible to redefine existing programming interfaces after the fact without disrupting existing applications.

If one were to define a new interface, it might make sense to partition the units into minutes and seconds as you describe.

We've already bumped time_t to be a 64-bit value on x86_64 which extends the resolution quite a bit further into the future for that platform.

I know about that solution... but what about 32-bit computers?
 

...it is a more sane way (IMO) to solve it than passing from the bits in which it is counted and therefore DOUBLING that variable.

Wouldn't it be more than double?

Kevin

i am not a math major... i barely stay studying in the university of costa rica and in the véritas university...
i just want to hack (make great code)... and eat, and pay for some expenses... that is why i am also looking for a job (with a so-so luck).

--
Esteban Giuseppe Bodigami Vincenzi
 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: 2048 bug
      • From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>
References: 
 >2048 bug (From: Esteban Bodigami <email@hidden>)
 >Re: 2048 bug (From: Kevin Van Vechten <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Application entry point
  • Next by Date: Re: 2048 bug
  • Previous by thread: Re: 2048 bug
  • Next by thread: Re: 2048 bug
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread