Re: GCC stack size
Re: GCC stack size
- Subject: Re: GCC stack size
- From: Shawn Erickson <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:55:15 -0800
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Ryan McGann <email@hidden> wrote:
> Just to let everybody know (and for the sake of the archives), it appears to
> be our kernel extension is running into a known limitation of GCC. Just to
> recap, we have a function in a very portable, very lightweight library, that
> for some reason is getting compiled with a 1600+ byte stack when compiled
> on/for Darwin. No matter what compiler options I tried, and what
> optimization levels I used, the stack was no smaller than 1400 bytes.
I am curious if you could create a simple stand alone code example
that shows the issue you are seeing?
It would be helpful for others to understand the issue and possibly avoid it.
-Shawn
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden