Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
- Subject: Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
- From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:56:00 -0700
On Sep 4, 2009, at 7:17 PM, William Siegrist wrote:
On Sep 4, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Steve Checkoway wrote:
On Sep 4, 2009, at 10:00 AM, William Siegrist wrote:
The Darwin Team is aware of the request for libunwind. I'll put
down another vote for it, so no need to file more radars or emails.
Comments like this confuse me since other @apple.com people have
said that radars are the only way Apple knows what people are
wanting and duplicate radars show more interest.
Like Terry said, in this case, 1 person wanting it so they can build
ld64 is the same as 100 people wanting it. We know everyone needs it
to build ld64.
Got it, thanks!
--
Steve Checkoway
"Anyone who says that the solution is to educate the users
hasn't ever met an actual user." -- Bruce Schneier
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden