Re: madvise
Re: madvise
- Subject: Re: madvise
- From: Paul Nelson <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:12:33 -0500
madvise is implemented. However, it is a no-op if you pass 0 for the size.
Paul Nelson
Thursby Software Systems, Inc.
On Apr 13, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
>
> Le 13 avr. 2010 à 19:47, Joel Reymont a écrit :
>
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
>>
>>> Can I ask you what make you think so ?
>>
>> I could swear I read on this list that one of the m* functions was a no-op. This was during previous virtual memory discussions. I will try to dig it up if Terry says I'm crazy :D.
>>
>
> You're probably referring to this post:
>
> http://lists.apple.com/archives/darwin-dev/2010/Feb/msg00022.html
>
> This is the only one returns by Google for the following search:
>
> madvise site:lists.apple.com/archives/Darwin-dev/
>
>
>
> -- Jean-Daniel
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
References: | |
| >madvise (From: Joel Reymont <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: madvise (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: madvise (From: Joel Reymont <email@hidden>) |
| >Re: madvise (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>) |