Re: jemalloc to replace default allocator
Re: jemalloc to replace default allocator
- Subject: Re: jemalloc to replace default allocator
- From: Joel Reymont <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 11:08:13 +0100
Alastair,
On May 7, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Alastair Houghton wrote:
> Personally, unless you have a really good justification for using jemalloc instead (and I'd argue that, for that, you need measurements showing that it's significantly faster than the system implementation), I'd stick with the system malloc.
I get your point but let's just say this is something I've been tasked with. Apparently, the Javascript team discovered that too much time is being spent in free, or something like that. My goal is to plug in jemalloc and then let the Javascript team profile again.
Thanks, Joel
---
http://twitter.com/wagerlabs
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden