• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT


  • Subject: Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
  • From: John B Brown <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 13:12:21 -0600

Dear Folk,

I do believe the first clue to the general lie that Apple supports a legitimate port of the GNU compiler system is the fact that Apple has not ported Glibc to the Mac OS.

	DUH!

On 5/11/10 12:15 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
Reading documentation is bullshit too!

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Mo McRoberts<email@hidden>  wrote:


On 11-May-2010, at 19:00, John B Brown wrote:

Dear Folk,

I see that, in addition to screwing up other GNU utilities, Apple
has screwed up the C and GNU compiler system. This is NOT porting, it is
pulling a SUN; call it standard but make it proprietary.

In order to write and compile C code on an Apple you must ignore
the workings of the C and GNU compilers and use a proprietary Apple system.

That is pure BULLSHIT!

The framework-supporting extensions have been part of GCC for, literally, years. I might be wrong, but I’m pretty sure they were part of the enhancements which NeXT contributed back to the GCC project as part of support for Objective-C. It just happens that GCC only enables this functionality when built for Darwin, but it’s part of the mainline source (indeed, there have been plenty of people over the years asking if it can be enabled on other platforms, too).

In this case, looking in framework paths for headers is a pretty
straightforward backwards-compatible enhancement. Not exactly “pure
BULLSHIT”, whichever way you look at it. You don’t ignore the workings of
the C and GNU compilers (which in many cases are one and the same — clang
behaves the same way, though, for obvious reasons); you just RTFM when
developing on the platform and be aware that the compilers do more on Darwin
than they do on other systems.

There are *dozens* of platform-specific aspects to the GNU Compiler System
and Binutils. Are they all bullshit, too?

M.

  _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden






	Shalom,

	John B. Brown.
	[email@hidden]
	358 High Street,
	Buffalo, Wyoming
	82834

"Freedom is not worth having if it does not include
the freedom to make mistakes"  Mahatma Gandhi
"If any question why we died, tell them,
because our fathers lied."  Rudyard Kipling
"A man who does not know the truth is just an idiot
but a man who knows the truth and calls it a lie
is a crook."  Bertolt Brecht
"I wonder whether the world is being run
by smart people who are putting us on
or by imbeciles who really mean it."  Mark Twain
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
      • From: David Leimbach <email@hidden>
    • Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
      • From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>
    • Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
      • From: Mo McRoberts <email@hidden>
    • Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
      • From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Andy Huang <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: John B Brown <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: John B Brown <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Uli Kusterer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Jean-Daniel Dupas <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: John B Brown <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: Mo McRoberts <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT (From: David Leimbach <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
  • Next by Date: Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
  • Previous by thread: Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
  • Next by thread: Re: Using SystemConfiguration API inside KEXT
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread