Re: TAPI missing: was Re: Dev Tools 9 missing
Re: TAPI missing: was Re: Dev Tools 9 missing
- Subject: Re: TAPI missing: was Re: Dev Tools 9 missing
- From: Software Developer <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 20:11:48 +0000
- Thread-topic: TAPI missing: was Re: Dev Tools 9 missing
Jeremy, Folks,
> On 9 Apr 2019, at 16:21, Software Developer
> <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 9 Apr 2019, at 22:08, Jean-Daniel <email@hidden> wrote
>>
>>> Le 9 avr. 2019 à 21:37, Software Developer
>>> <email@hidden> a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi Jeremy,
>>>
>>>> On 9 Apr 2019, at 20:24, Jeremy Sequoia <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I thought I responded. That “coming soon” is incorrect. It should state
>>>> Distributed via Github” or similar.
To be clear the code on github would not seem to be a direct reflection of the
sources for the published Xcode releases (9.x, 10.x).
There is a single branch dated 7 Sep 2017 [https://github.com/ributzka/tapi].
I don’t see any tapi repository under https://github.com/apple.
If there’s a plan to push branches reflecting tapi-902.0.9 through
tapi-1000.10.8, that would be great (or a source drop in the usual way)..
>>>> I am not sure if the drop was actually made to github or not yet, but that
>>>> is where you should look for clang, llvm, lldb, tapi, swift et al.
>>>
>>> OK, thanks - the situation is I don’t think it’s made upstream LLVM yet..
>>> My understanding is that the drop on github, (which I’m using - you can see
>>> my mods to it on my github) is an ‘early preview’ and isn’t in the same
>>> shape as the final (e.g. there’s some partitioning needed between LLVM and
>>> clang parts). I will keep an eye on upstream (although I think I tried a
>>> search on Phab too, without pulling anything up beyond the initial
>>> proposal).
>>
>> Is this what you are talking about ? https://reviews.llvm.org/rL347808
>>
> heh .. it looks like lib/TextAPI/Mach-O has appeared upstream quite recently
> - I will take a look there, and watch opensource.apple.com too.
It’s really great that tapi has started to appear in upstream LLVM, and
hopefully that will become complete enough for us to use it directly. However,
I don’t think we’re yet at that point - so the “traditional” (and retrospective
for 9.x, 10.x) sources are still needed for now.
Thanks
Iain
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden